LiteTracker vs Asana
Sprint planning built for engineers, not project managers
Asana is built for task and project management. LiteTracker is built for agile engineering teams — sprint boards, story points, velocity tracking, and the accept/reject workflow baked in.
How LiteTracker stacks up against Asana
| LiteTracker | Asana | |
|---|---|---|
| Sprint / Iteration Planning | workarounds needed | |
| Story Points | custom fields only | |
| Velocity Tracking | ||
| Accept/Reject Workflow | ||
| Epics | Portfolios | |
| Import from Pivotal Tracker | ||
| Free Plan | ||
| Pricing model | $10/seat/mo Pro | Per-seat (expensive) |
| Unlimited Users on paid | ||
| Dark Mode | ||
| Built for agile teams | ||
| Burndown Charts |
Why engineering teams choose LiteTracker over Asana
Built for engineering sprints
LiteTracker is designed around the agile iteration loop — not adapted from a general task manager. Story states, points, and velocity are first-class features.
No workarounds needed
Story points in Asana require custom fields. Velocity tracking doesn't exist. LiteTracker has both built in from day one.
Import from Pivotal Tracker
Moving from Pivotal? One-click import brings your full history. Asana has no Pivotal import path.
Switch from Asana to LiteTracker
Free plan available. No credit card required. Built for engineering teams.